Nice comment and thanks for sharing this post. Getting a bit ahead of things, but here's where I think this subject and related ones may be leading: The *convergence* of parapantheism, parapsychism, and resonance theory could offer a unified worldview where consciousness and divinity are not localized phenomena, but fields of relational vibration that *pervade and exceed* the universe. Instead of God being identical with the cosmos (pantheism) or mind being reducible to matter (materialism), this system suggests a deeper, trans-material reality that resonates into being, where things are not divine or conscious by nature, but by connection—by how attuned they are to a greater field.
Thanks so much for reading and commenting and sharing those beautiful thoughts. What you're saying reminds me a bit of Carlo Rovelli's Relational Quantum Mechanics, though I am certainly not a physicist or in any way qualified to say such :)
Thanks so much for mentioning Rovelli’s Relational Quantum Mechanics. To the idea of reality being a feedback system in general, I’m very interested in the possibility that what we call “synchronicities” might represent subtle aberrations in time-space—perhaps even the result of quantum interactions emerging in a kind of seamless, superimposed fashion. What if synchronicities are triggered by individual or collective attention at a quantum level? It would be something like a wave-particle event—an interference, almost—that momentarily disrupts the normal 'wave' flow of spacetime. And because quanta are more foundational than classical structures, the effect is hidden in plain sight, appearing seamless.
When synchronicities are seen as interruptions in the regular flow of space-time, we might be brushing against macro-scale quantum effects—moments where the deeper informational substrate of reality reveals itself. I have a growing sense that our “classical” reality is actually something more fluid, participatory, and information-based—where consciousness and observation aren’t passengers, but active participants in shaping what unfolds.
A key step would be to scientifically define and identify when true non-randomness occurs—then observe not just the result, but the audience involved, whether micro or macro. Here’s where the mystery deepens: in some synchronicity clusters, earlier events seem to foreshadow later ones. This raises the classic chicken-or-egg question: are these events initiated by localized minds (observers), or is some external intelligence setting the sequence in motion? Either way, it suggests the potential to disrupt normal causality via quantum processes. Much depends on pattern coherence and statistical improbability—if we can rule out chance, then something new is operating beyond classical explanation.
If you like, I can shoot you a couple of graphs that show you what I'm getting at.
Thanks, Joe. Just to be clear, I’ve only read Rovelli as far as AI has led me—I do like the idea of a less rigid approach to understanding quantum effects.
Also, please don’t mistake my links as any kind of evangelizing. The thing is, that particular case study represents the only time in my life when the public took synchronicity seriously. I had to remind people of that moment—and show just how superficial their so-called “serious” treatment really was.
The vast majority of my case studies are non-religious, but they follow the same formula: they concern data that is incontrovertibly meaningful to local groups, with the subject as percipient.
I enjoyed reading this. I recently wrote a short story --Calista-- that relates to the title of this piece. Yes, everything is conscious. Inner and outer universes are intimately connected and reflect each other. Energy flows everywhere constantly morphing, manifesting, and one sentient entity is at the core of it all.
Nice comment and thanks for sharing this post. Getting a bit ahead of things, but here's where I think this subject and related ones may be leading: The *convergence* of parapantheism, parapsychism, and resonance theory could offer a unified worldview where consciousness and divinity are not localized phenomena, but fields of relational vibration that *pervade and exceed* the universe. Instead of God being identical with the cosmos (pantheism) or mind being reducible to matter (materialism), this system suggests a deeper, trans-material reality that resonates into being, where things are not divine or conscious by nature, but by connection—by how attuned they are to a greater field.
Thanks so much for reading and commenting and sharing those beautiful thoughts. What you're saying reminds me a bit of Carlo Rovelli's Relational Quantum Mechanics, though I am certainly not a physicist or in any way qualified to say such :)
Hi Joe,
Thanks so much for mentioning Rovelli’s Relational Quantum Mechanics. To the idea of reality being a feedback system in general, I’m very interested in the possibility that what we call “synchronicities” might represent subtle aberrations in time-space—perhaps even the result of quantum interactions emerging in a kind of seamless, superimposed fashion. What if synchronicities are triggered by individual or collective attention at a quantum level? It would be something like a wave-particle event—an interference, almost—that momentarily disrupts the normal 'wave' flow of spacetime. And because quanta are more foundational than classical structures, the effect is hidden in plain sight, appearing seamless.
When synchronicities are seen as interruptions in the regular flow of space-time, we might be brushing against macro-scale quantum effects—moments where the deeper informational substrate of reality reveals itself. I have a growing sense that our “classical” reality is actually something more fluid, participatory, and information-based—where consciousness and observation aren’t passengers, but active participants in shaping what unfolds.
A key step would be to scientifically define and identify when true non-randomness occurs—then observe not just the result, but the audience involved, whether micro or macro. Here’s where the mystery deepens: in some synchronicity clusters, earlier events seem to foreshadow later ones. This raises the classic chicken-or-egg question: are these events initiated by localized minds (observers), or is some external intelligence setting the sequence in motion? Either way, it suggests the potential to disrupt normal causality via quantum processes. Much depends on pattern coherence and statistical improbability—if we can rule out chance, then something new is operating beyond classical explanation.
If you like, I can shoot you a couple of graphs that show you what I'm getting at.
Fascinating! Thanks for elaborating on this.
Thanks, Joe. Just to be clear, I’ve only read Rovelli as far as AI has led me—I do like the idea of a less rigid approach to understanding quantum effects.
Also, please don’t mistake my links as any kind of evangelizing. The thing is, that particular case study represents the only time in my life when the public took synchronicity seriously. I had to remind people of that moment—and show just how superficial their so-called “serious” treatment really was.
The vast majority of my case studies are non-religious, but they follow the same formula: they concern data that is incontrovertibly meaningful to local groups, with the subject as percipient.
I enjoyed reading this. I recently wrote a short story --Calista-- that relates to the title of this piece. Yes, everything is conscious. Inner and outer universes are intimately connected and reflect each other. Energy flows everywhere constantly morphing, manifesting, and one sentient entity is at the core of it all.
Thanks for saying that, and very cool. I will check it out!
Happy New Year! I look forward to your feedback.